Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice HolMes
The appellant had an authorized bridge across the Mississippi River. with a pivot pier and draw, to permit the passage of vessels. As a necessary incident it maintained what is called a protection pier extending down stream. In consequence of later authorized Constructions it became necessary to deepen the channel on the easterly side of the pier, and the part of this work with which we are concerned was done by the United States. The bed of the stream by the side of the pier was solid rock and into this the United States drilled and blasted it with dynamite. The work was done in the usual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bedford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Talbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Texas Highway Department v. WeberTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Angelle v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Columbia Basin Orchard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.