Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co., Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1962No. Civ. 199PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Respondents have moved this court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellants attempt to appeal from an order which is not appealable.
Appellants, stockholders of Fosca Oil Co., Ltd., brought a derivative action against the corporation and certain officers and directors of the corporation, the complaint containing three alleged causes of action. Respondents’ motion for an order requiring plaintiffs to furnish security for costs was denied. On appeal, the order of denial was affirmed as to the first and second causes of action and remanded to the trial court with directions to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Avery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Rhodes v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Pacific Engine & Machine Works v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Matthew C.California Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Woodman v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. CiancioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.