Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc. v. United Medical
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.
Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc. appeals from a judgment in favor of United Medical on its claim for indemnity under Section 82.002 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code (the “CPRC”). Ansell contends that United Medical failed to properly segregate its indemnifiable losses, that the attorney’s fees award is unreasonable as a matter of law, and that trial court erred by failing to make the appellate attorney’s fees awards contingent on success on appeal. We conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s awards for indemnity and attorney’s fees…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northern and Western Insurance Company Ltd. v. Sentinel Investment Group, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- United Medical Supply Company, Inc. v. Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Austex Tree Service, Inc. v. Unifirst Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- Harbor America Central, Inc. v. William Reeves, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2024
- Jaime Lopez and Silvia Rodriguez Lopez v. State National Insurance Company and Wellington Risk Insurance Agency, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.