Legal Opinion
Plainfield-Union Water Co. v. Borough of Mountainside
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 11, 1954PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
We remanded this cause for the correction of error in the proceedings eventuating in the challenged resolution adopted by the Water Policy and Supply Council on June 16, 1952, approving plans of the Plainfield-Union Water Company for securing an additional sub-surface water supply. It was found on the earlier appeal that evidentiary data supplied by the Council's engineering staff, not the subject of testimony adduced at a hearing on notice to the parties in interest, and staff findings and conclusions thereon unsupported by evidence presented…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Maggie Dudley, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for James Dudley, a Minor v. South Jersey Metal, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Alvaro Cabrera v. James Barbo, Administrator of Northern State Prison the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, Peter VernieroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Beirn v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Sheehan v. SheehanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- In Re Application of Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.