Buis v. Henry Medford, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
Defendant appeals from the chancellor’s establishing a boundary line between the parties, insisting the Powell River is the true boundary line separating the parties’ lands.
The dispute is essentially over 4 acres of land lying along the eastern side of the Powell River. At trial, it was the contention of the plaintiff that his boundary crossed the river and encompassed the 4 acres, while the defendant insisted that the boundary between the parties was the river.
After hearing the evidence, the chancellor rejected all claims of adverse possession and concluded “[NJeither…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lieberman v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. v. Kingston Bank & Thust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Cusick v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Turnage v. KentonTennessee Supreme Court · 1899