Tolksdorf v. Griffith
Michigan Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Judge Shepherd
concurred, but wrote separately to express his view that the private roads act had “noth*6ing to do with the taking by a public authority of property for a public purpose.” Id. at 633. Instead, he opined that the act authorized a permissible limitation on the private use of land.
The next panel to consider the act’s constitutionality disagreed with Bieker, but found itself constrained to follow it. McKeighan v Grass Lake Twp Supervisor (McKeighan I), Docket No. 195437, unpublished opinion per curiam, issued May 8, 1998, vacated May 20, 1998, printed at 229 Mich App 801; 587 NW2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Shizas v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Lansing v. Edward Rose Realty, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.