Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The defendant Blidberg Rothchild Company, Inc. (hereinafter designated as Blidberg) has moved for an order dismissing the above-entitled action on the ground that an earlier instituted libel in admiralty (Admiralty No. 189-358) is pending for the same recovery, that plaintiffs are precluded from bringing this action at law, and that this action is vexatious and causing defendant Blidberg to defend two actions for the same recovery.
On November 2, 1956, Reva McLaughlin, Administratrix of the Estate of Clarence R. McLaughlin, Deceased, instituted an admiralty libel…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Balado v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Evelyn McAfoos and William Neff v. The Canadian Pacific Steamships, Ltd., and the Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Nilsson v. American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958