Legal Opinion

Van Atta v. Henry.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1938No. Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 40,171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Defendant Harold A. Henry operated a grocery store and meat market in the city of Jackson, Michigan. Plaintiff Clayton E. Van Atta was a meat cutter by trade and was employed by defendant to manage and operate the meat market, receiving a salary of $40 per week. On June 8,1931, while engaged in his employment in defendant’s market plaintiff suffered an injury. He gives the following testimony as to the occurrence:

“Had a quarter of beef on the block in the market, had cut off a piece and took the rest of it into the ice box — they kept sawdust on the floor — and hung a quarter of beef on a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Catina v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McKay v. Jackson & Tindle, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Runnels v. Allied Engineers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Gustafson v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Leskinen v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hayward v. Kalamazoo Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API