Legal Opinion
ADP, LLC v. PITTMAN
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 18, 2019No. 2:19-cv-16237Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ADP, LLC, Civ. No. 19-16237 (KM) (MAH) Plaintiff, OPINION v. SUMMER PITTMAN, Defendant. □ KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: Defendant Summer Pittman spent nine years employed in various sales positions by Plaintiff ADP, LLC. During that time, she and ADP signed several restrictive covenants in which she agreed that in the event of her non- employment by ADP, she would for a period not (1) compete with ADP, (2) disclose its confidential information, or (3) solicit its clients. In June 2019, Pittman abruptly left ADP and accepted a position…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.