Legal Opinion

People v. Ford

California Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1988No. Crim. 25361PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EAGLESON, J.

Subdivision (a) of Evidence Code section 913 states: “If in the instant proceeding or on a prior occasion a privilege is or was exercised not to testify with respect to any matter, or to refuse to disclose or to prevent another from disclosing any matter, neither the presiding officer nor counsel may comment thereon, no presumption shall arise because of the exercise of the privilege, and the trier of fact may not draw any inference therefrom as to the credibility of the witness or as to any matter at issue in the proceeding.”1

In this case we consider whether that statutory…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Leif Taylor v. Thomas M. Maddox, Interim Director George Galaza Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API