Legal Opinion

Jameson v. Arrow Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 28, 1996No. 94-8772PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question of whether an employer’s failure to rehire or to transfer an employee whose position is eliminated as part of a reduction in force can give rise to an inference of age and race discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer on all claims. For the reasons that follow, we determine that material questions of fact remain for resolution with respect to the former employee’s age and race discrimination claims. We AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mann v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Damon v. Fleming Supermarkets of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Little v. United TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Turlington v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API