Legal Opinion

Ekstrom v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 6, 1937No. J-24PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

This is an action to recover with interest the sum of $54,451.90 paid by the Mechanics Machine Company as manufacturers’ excise taxes under section 900 of the Revenue Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 291) and section 600 of the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 322). The Mechanics Machine Company from January 1921, until its dissolution, was an Illinois corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of transmissions and parts therefor, also universal joints and parts therefor. On June 30, 1928, the directors and stockholders of the Mechanics Machine Company voted to dissolve the corporation.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. JoySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Milwaukee Motor Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Busler v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
  2. EkstromUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  3. Simpson v. Nissan of North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API