Legal Opinion
Peer v. Claremont
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 8, 1960No. Civ. No. 9730PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
The principal question to be decided in this case is the validity of a tax foreclosure proceeding prosecuted by Benton County, Oregon, in a proceeding which was commenced on March 23, 1939.
On August 4, 1927, a patent was issued from the United States to one William C. Stumberg, describing the following property in said Benton County:
“Lot 1 and the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 3 in Township eleven south of Range six west of the Willamette Meridian, Oregon, containing eighty-three acres and eighty-six hundredths of an acre.”
This patent was not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bogard v. BarhanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Elliott v. ClementOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Frederick v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- National Surety Corp. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hiersche v. Seamless Rubber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Rosholt v. County of SnohomishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Powrie v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1962