Legal Opinion

Rosholt v. County of Snohomish

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 21, 1978No. 4412-1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

The defendants Palzer appeal from a judgment setting aside a real estate tax foreclosure deed on the basis that no jurisdiction had been obtained. The property, situated in Snohomish County, is legally described as:

The East 70 feet of Lot 7, Paine Field Addition No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 59, records of Snohomish County, Washington; together with and subject to an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under and across the North 30 feet of said Lot 7, except the East 295 feet thereof; and subject to an easement over the North 20 feet of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Pierce County v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Jones v. ParkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n for Preservation of Neighborhood Safety & Environment v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Clallam County v. FolkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wenatchee Reclamation District v. MustellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API