Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Landmark Mgmt. Group
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2016No. S-14-867PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/24/2016 09:09 AM CDT - 890 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 293 Nebraska R eports PIERCE v. LANDMARK MGMT. GROUP Cite as
293 Neb. 890
Sybille Pierce, appellee, v. Landmark M anagement Group, Inc., et al., appellants. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 24, 2016. No. S-14-867. 1. Appeal and Error. An alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error to be considered by an appellate court. 2. Trial: Appeal and Error. A general assignment that the court errone- ously…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Popoalii v. Correctional Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Alvin Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation, Engine Division, and Andre J. Lambert, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Darrell D. Thurman v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- First Nat. Bank North Platte v. CardenasNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- D.I. v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. KrugerNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
- Moss v. Associated UnderwritersNebraska Court of Appeals · 2020
- Crozier v. Brownell-Talbot SchoolNebraska Court of Appeals · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.