Legal Opinion
Application of Bubb v. Christensen
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 19, 1980No. 79SA275PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
James E. Bubb (Bubb) and Richard E. Yeager (Yeager) filed an application in the water court 1 for Water Division No. 6 to make absolute their conditional water right for Yeager & Bubb Spring No. 1. The point of diversion of that conditional water right is on a lot owned by Vernon C. Christensen and Estella D. Christensen (Christensens). Bubb and Yeager later filed a complaint in the district court for Routt County, seeking a declaration that they own an easement for water diversion and transportation facilities across the Christensens’ lot for the purpose of developing and utilizing Yeager &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elk-Rifle Water Company v. TempletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Stuart v. Colorado Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co. v. SillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Board of County Commissioners v. WhelenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.