Rankin v. Mark
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
Sol Mark and wife, by their original and amended bills of complaint, sought to cancel a mineral conveyance from Albert Buck Mark to H. L. Rankin of date of November 7,1945, on the SE% of the NE% of Section 8, Township 1 North, Range 13 East, insofar as such conveyance pertained to their title thereto. It was charged that the grantors and the grantee in that instrument perpetrated a fraud upon the complainants. The Humble Oil & Refining Company, a corporation, as the assignee of a mineral lease thereon from H. L. Rankin, was made a necessary but nominal defendant because the bill averred that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Forman v. Mississippi Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- Walley v. HUNTMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Aultman v. KellyMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
- Milam v. PaxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Cooper v. CooperMississippi Supreme Court · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. EdwardsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Williams v. KilgoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Gentry v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Schiro v. American Tobacco Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- McMillan v. PuckettMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.