Legal Opinion

Rankin v. Mark

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1960No. 41465PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Sol Mark and wife, by their original and amended bills of complaint, sought to cancel a mineral conveyance from Albert Buck Mark to H. L. Rankin of date of November 7,1945, on the SE% of the NE% of Section 8, Township 1 North, Range 13 East, insofar as such conveyance pertained to their title thereto. It was charged that the grantors and the grantee in that instrument perpetrated a fraud upon the complainants. The Humble Oil & Refining Company, a corporation, as the assignee of a mineral lease thereon from H. L. Rankin, was made a necessary but nominal defendant because the bill averred that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Forman v. Mississippi Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Walley v. HUNTMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Aultman v. KellyMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Milam v. PaxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cooper v. CooperMississippi Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. EdwardsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Williams v. KilgoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gentry v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Schiro v. American Tobacco Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McMillan v. PuckettMississippi Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API