Legal Opinion

Milam v. Paxton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1931No. 29265PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

In the year 1917 appellant and appellee W. G. Paxton had an oral agreement by which appellant was to pur,chase of said appellee the lands in Sharkey county, described in the bill. The purchase price agreed upon was three thousand dollars, and the payments thereon were to bei in installments at such times and in such amounts as should be agreeable to appellant. On December 26', 1917, appellant paid eight hundred dollars of said price, and on the next day appellee Paxton, by letter, acknowledged receipt thereof as part payment and promised to forward deed as soon as same could be conveniently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington v. SoriaMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Masonic Benefit Ass'n v. First State BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cock v. AbernathyMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Fowlkes v. LeaMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Farmer v. BestMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dew v. LangfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Union National Life Ins. Co. v. CrosbyMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Aultman v. KellyMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hamilton v. McGillMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Yeates v. BoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API