Legal Opinion

Mangum v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 618, in part, is as follows: “In all cases in the courts of this State wherein judgment has been or may hereafter be rendered against two or more persons or corporations, who are jointly and severally liable for its payment either as joint obligors or joint tort-feasors, and the same has not been paid by all the judgment debtors by each paying his proportionate part thereof, one of the judgment debtors shall pay the judgment creditor, either before or after execution has been issued, the amount due on said judgment, and shall, at the time of paying the same,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Trust Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Gaffney v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Howell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Freeman v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Smith v. . KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Lackey v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API