Legal Opinion

Rush v. State, Department of Natural Resources

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2004No. S-10926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Mat-Su Resource Conservation and Development, a non-profit corporation, owns the buildings that make up the Big Lake Hatch ery and leases from the state the land under those buildings. The Alaska Department of Natural Resources plans to auction the land. It intends to run the auction according to the terms of AS 38.05.090 as that statute read when the corporation took on the lease, which will require any buyer of the land to also purchase the buildings from the corporation. The statute has since been amended. The appellant, Evelyn Rush, argues that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Krossa v. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Norton v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Van Sickle v. McGrawAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pfeifer v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Public AssistanceAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Prax v. ZalewskiAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. GreerColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API