Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Coburn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1999No. WCB 96-10496; CA A99711PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversing an order of the administrative law judge (ALJ) and holding that, after claim closure and claimant’s subsequent completion of an authorized training program (ATP), employer was not entitled to redetermine the extent of claimant’s unscheduled permanent disability because the original award had become final. We agree with employer that the Board erred in holding that there could be no redetermination of the extent of claimant’s disability. We conclude, however, that employer is not entitled to an offset of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. United Beer DistributorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Forney v. Western States PlywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Fazzolari v. United Beer DistributorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Travis v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. SAIF Corp. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giltner v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Bledsoe v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Fox v. Ross Bros.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Giltner v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Holdren v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API