Legal Opinion

Fazzolari v. United Beer Distributors

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 1988No. WCB 85-16090; CA A45497PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Employer petitions for review of our opinion in Fazzolari v. United Beer Distributors, 91 Or App 592, 757 P2d 857 (1988). We treat the petition as a petition for reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, and allow reconsideration for the purpose of amplifying our opinion. Employer contends that we incorrectly stated that claimant did not return to work until after August 12, 1985, when, in fact, he returned to work immediately after he was released for work on March 22, 1985. We reviewed this matter under ORS 656.298(6) only for substantial evidence. Although there is some evidence to suggest that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fazzolari v. United Beer DistributorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lebanon Plywood v. SeiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Forshee & Langley Logging v. PeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. SAIF Corp. v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Metro Machinery Rigging v. TallentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Bledsoe v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API