Legal Opinion

Fox v. Ross Bros.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 5, 2001No. 99-01031; A109773Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

An administrative law judge (ALJ) directed SAIF, claimant’s employer’s insurer, to pay claimant 51 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability (PPD) and a penalty against SAIF for unreasonably having failed to do so. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversed, and claimant petitions for judicial review. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

Claimant compensably injured his back in February 1995. He became medically stationary in June 1996, and a determination order closed his claim and awarded him 38 percent PPD. On reconsideration, the award was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. SAIF Corp. v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. SAIF Corp. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. SAIF Corp. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API