Legal Opinion

Farone v. Korey Motors, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

On the face of CPLR 3122, this motion by plaintiff for a protective order with regard to a defendant’s notice for discovery and inspection is untimely. However, the section should be read with and related to CPLR. 3103, subd. (a) which latter provides that a court may make a protective order on its own initiative at any time (3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3122.01). However, good cause for a departure from the stated time limit .should be shown.

*566Despite a failure to excuse the tardiness of this motion a complicating factor is manifested in that the notice itself was served…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Edwardes v. Southampton Hospital Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Fekeith v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API