Legal Opinion

Fekeith v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArnold Gr. Fraiman, J.

Motion for an order pursuant to OPLB 3124 compelling defendant to produce certain records for inspection is granted. The notice for discovery and inspection, *315made pursuant to CPLR 3120, was served on defendant on August 20, 1970. No application for a protective order was made by defendant within the five-day period provided for in CPLR, 3122, and no satisfactory excuse has been offered for its failure to comply with the time requirements of that rule. Defendant is therefore barred from objecting to the production of the items sought in plaintiff’s notice. (Coffey v. Orbachs, Inc., 22 A D 2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farone v. Korey Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API