Legal Opinion

Crane v. Waggoner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1866PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Bartholomm Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, C. J.

This was an action by the appellees for the partition of real estate. The wives of the appellee, Waggoner, and appellant, Crane, claimed as heirs of Noah J. Smith, deceased, and the appellant, Caleb Crane, had purchased the interests of other heirs. The appellants moved to strike out of the complaint these words: “Plaintiffs further say, that the said. Caleb Crane has had possession of all of the above real estate of which the said Noah died seized, ever since the death of the said Noah.”

The court overruled this motion. This was error. The complaint did not allege that the appellees had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woolever v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ryason v. DuntenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Carver v. CoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bird v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1875
  5. Schissel v. DicksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API