Legal Opinion

Carver v. Coffman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1887No. 12,720PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case appellee Coffman sued appellant Carver to obtain the partition of certain real estate, particularly described, in Madison county. In his complaint, appellee alleged that he was the owner of the undivided two-thirds part, and the appellant was the owner of the undivided one-third part, of such real estate.

*548The cause was put at issue and tried by the court, and a finding was made for appellee that he was the owner of the undivided two-thirds part of the real estate in controversy, and that appellant was the owner of the residue thereof, and an interlocutory order was entered,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Early & Wife v. FriendSupreme Court of Virginia · 1860
  3. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Estep v. EstepIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Shiels v. StarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ryason v. DuntenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Peden v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Parish v. CamplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API