Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Nicholson
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 15, 2005No. 2004-7034PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ (Board’s) decision, which rejected Timothy Jordan’s claim. Mr. Jordan had asserted that a 1983 Board decision denying him service connection status on a knee disorder contained clear and unmistakable error (CUE). Jordan v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 261 (Vet.App.2003). Because the Veter ans Court correctly determined that CUE does not arise from a change in the interpretation of a statute, this court affirms.
I
Mr. Jordan served in the military for one month and nineteen days, from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Reynoldsville Casket Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- James E. Szemraj, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Ronald W. Wagner, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Timothy J. Jordan v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
3Cited by27 opinions
- Denise Jarrell v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Robert J. Ingram v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Benjamin F. Kent v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- George v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Fagan v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.