Legal Opinion

Minnesota Equal Access Network Services v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 2002No. C4-02-236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Judge.

Respondent excavator cut appellant telephone company’s underground optic cable. Appellant sued for damages. The jury found that respondent did not conduct the excavation in a careful and prudent man*913ner and attributed 70% of the direct cause of the accident to respondent’s fault. But the district court ruled that appellant was not entitled to damages because it failed to respond to the excavation notice given by the excavator under the One Call Excavation Notice System. Because we conclude that the One Call Excavation Notice System does not abrogate the comparative fault…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siewert v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Means v. BURLINGTON NO. & SANTA FE R. CO.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API