Legal Opinion

United States v. Dario Restrepo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1989No. 88-3207PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Dario Restrepo appeals his forty-six month prison sentence imposed after he was convicted of two counts of distribution of cocaine. The appeal presents the following question concerning the interpretation of the new Sentencing Guidelines 1 (“Guidelines”): In sentencing Restrepo, did the district court err in construing the Guidelines’ Multiple Counts section (Chapter Three, Part D) to apply to conduct that did not result in his conviction. We conclude that conduct that does not result in a criminal conviction should not be considered under the Multiple Counts section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Ervin Earl RutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Ombey MobleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Harold G. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API