Legal Opinion

Heath v. Town of Darlington

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 1933No. 13735PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeER.

This is an action for damages on account of injuries sustained by plaintiff on one of the streets in the town of Darlington. The complaint, inter alia, alleges : “That on or about the 27 day of May, 1933, as plaintiff was walking on foot along the sidewalk on the south side of Pearl Street near the public square in the corporate limits of said town in front of a store building formerly occupied by Anderson’s Meat Market and bearing number 121, and assuming the said sidewalk to be in an ordinary safe condition, a large heavy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Irvine v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Dunn v. Town of BarnwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  4. Caston v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Lancaster v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Terrell v. City of OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Tate v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Heath v. BlackmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API