Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Hood

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1976No. 9765PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Presiding Judge.

Claimants-appellants are the parents and siblings of eighteen-year-old Richard Ferguson who, while working in the course of his employment as a service station attendant, was shot and killed during an armed robbery at the station on March 15, 1969. Asserting that they were partial dependents of Richard (§ 287.240, RSMo 1969, V.A. M.S.), claimants instituted this proceeding under the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Law. After a plenary hearing, the referee made extensive findings of fact and rulings of law and entered an award denying compensation to the alleged…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilhite v. HurdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Miller v. Sleight & Hellmuth Ink Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Brown v. Missouri Lumber Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Ricks v. H. K. Porter, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Barton v. Western Fireproofing CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Hagan v. ChevroletMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Heitzler v. EppenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Simmons v. Wilson Freight Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Paddock v. Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API