Paddock v. Chrysler Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Claimant was denied compensation and medical expenses by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The circuit court affirmed the decision of the Commis*34sion. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment.
On December 8, 1973, claimant sustained an accidental, work-related injury while in the employ of Chrysler Corporation, St. Louis County, Missouri. He was hit by a moving electric drill which tore his clothing and struck him in the area of the right groin. Claimant testified that as he was struck by the drill, he was twisted and his upper stomach hit the handle of the drill. He…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Petersen v. Central Pattern Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Vogel v. Hall Implement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Berardino v. General Molding, Inc., PDMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ferguson v. HoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Richardson v. Falcon Products, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matzker v. St. Joseph Minerals Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bell v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987