Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1973No. 44657PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $2500 in his action against the defendant insurance company to recover for an admitted fire loss. The only substantial issue of fact was whether the insurance coverage under the circumstances was $6000 or $2500. By their verdict, the jury decided this issue in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff, a Beckham County business man, had a farming operation and also operated a trucking business, hauling mostly cotton seed and baled cotton. His insurance needs for both the farming and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Union Transportation Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. George v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Minnehoma Oil Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Kenison v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Roberts v. Wells Fargo AG Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Batman v. Metro Petroleum, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. BRYAN'S CAR CORNER, INC. v. MANGUMCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. BRYAN'S CAR CORNER, INC. v. MANGUMCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API