Kerns v. Madison Gas & Electric Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
Richard and Kathleen Kerns, personal injury plaintiffs, petitioned for leave to appeal from a nonfinal order granting partial summary judgment in favor of MG&E. We granted the petition. The court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims that MG&E maintained its electrical transmission line below clearance requirements in violation of the electrical code, Wis. Adm. Code, sec. PSC 114 (February, 1982) 1 and the statutes, secs. 196.64, 2 196.67 3 and 196.74, 4 Stats. (1981-82), causing plaintiffs’ damages. MG&E does not challenge plaintiffs’ common law negligence claims on summary judgment. Because we…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Stoll v. AdriansenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Clinton F. Miller v. Leavenworth-Jefferson Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Pape Ex Rel. Johansen v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Kyle A. Ruhs v. Pacific Power & Light, a Maine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franklin v. Housing Authority of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Local Union No. 2490 v. Waukesha CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988