Jennifer Stephens v. Karen Hayes
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Jennifer Stephens and Urian R. Sturgis, Sr. (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”)— proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis-appeal the district court’s dismissal of their suit in which they asserted several claims arising out of the State of Michigan’s termination of their parental rights. We review de novo the district court’s orders of dismissal and grants of summary judgment. Biegas v. Quickway Carriers, Inc., 573 F.3d 365, 373, 377 (6th Cir.2009). For the following reasons, we affirm.
As a preliminary matter, several of Plaintiffs’ claims are asserted on behalf of their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ortiz v. Jimenez-SanchezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
- Binyah v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Chappel v. HunterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Chappel v. HunterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Clark v. CromwellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.