Legal Opinion
Hammel v. Ruby
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 20, 1985No. 5-84-0466PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE KASSERMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, Phyllis Hammel, d/b/a Century 21-Hammel, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Randolph County against defendants, James A. Ruby and Ann Degenhardt, for payment of a brokerage commission allegedly due to plaintiff as a result of the sale of certain real estate owned by defendants, which was located in Steeleville. Following a bench trial, the court found in favor of plaintiff and ordered defendants to pay plaintiff the sum of $3,720 plus prejudgment interest.
On appeal, defendants maintain that the trial court erred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Susmano v. ASSOC. INTERNISTS OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Felbinger & Co. v. TraiforosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Bolger v. Danley Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Salem National Bank v. ChapmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Emerich v. LevitonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Foxfield Realty, Inc. v. KubalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- New Hampshire Insurance v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- U S G Interiors, Inc. v. Commercial & Architectural Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Fenton v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.