Legal Opinion

New Hampshire Insurance v. Hanover Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1998No. 1-96-2235PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gallagher

This appeal involves an insurance coverage dispute between plaintiff, New Hampshire Insurance Company (New Hampshire), and defendant, Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), regarding the priority of coverage as between two insurance policies. Hanover appeals from the trial court’s decision that the umbrella policy issued by New Hampshire was an excess policy over and above the primary commercial general liability policy issued by Hanover, thereby entitling New Hampshire to reimbursement of $450,000 paid to settle the underlying case, plus prejudgment interest. We affirm. The relevant facts…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. City of Springfield v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Farley v. Marion Power Shovel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. WetzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kajima Construction Services, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Platinum Technology, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Westfield InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co v. Procaccio Painting & Drywall CCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API