Legal Opinion
Roesman v. DeHart
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 3, 1947No. Civ. 13330PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment refusing to quiet his title to a parcel of real property in San Francisco.
The property was ■ originally owned by Mary Flecchia, a sister of the plaintiff. In 1927, Mary Flecchia conveyed the property to p'láintiff. In 1932, Mary Flecchia arid her husband borrowed $3,000 from American Trust Company and to secure a promissory note in that amount plaintiff joined with Mary Flecchia and her husband in executing a deed of trust of the property. In 1937, this promissory note was in default. Plaintiff purchased the note from American Trust Company and through…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bicocchi v. Casey-Swasey Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
- Davis v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Spear v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Williamson v. KinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Lockren v. RustanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gobins v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Sobel Building Development Partners v. Broach (In re Sexton)District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Stansbury v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Gobins v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1952