Legal Opinion
Nadia Naffe v. John Frey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 2015No. 13-55666PublishedCited by 336 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Nadia Naffe appeals the district court’s dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim and six related state law causes of action. Her appeal requires us to resolve two issues. First, we must decide whether the factual allegations in Naffe’s complaint are sufficient to support her claim that Defendant John Patrick Frey — a Los An-geles County Deputy District Attorney— acted under color of state law for the purposes of § 1983 when he published derogatory statements about Naffe on his personal Internet blog and on Twitter. Second, we must determine if the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by336 opinions
- Hyun Park v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Maine Community Health Options v. Albertsons Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Trader Joe's Co. v. Michael HallattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Rea Paeste v. Government of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
331 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.