Legal Opinion

In re Civil Service Charges & Specifications Against Piper

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 99-256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

We are asked to decide whether a police officer who is the subject of an internal affairs investigation and is compelled to appear before a superior officer for the purpose of answering questions during the course of the investigation is entitled to legal representation pursuant to R.C. 9.84.2 For the following reasons, we find that R.C. 9.84 provides for legal representation in this instance. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

R.C. 9.84 states:

“Any person appearing as a witness before any public official, department, board, bureau, commission, agency,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Jones v. Franklin County SheriffOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of SeasOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Basic Distribution Corp. v. Ohio Department of TaxationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re Civ. Serv. Charges & Specs. Against PiperOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kirch v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API