Legal Opinion
Clark v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided July 2, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLCOTT, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from an order of the Chancellor directing receivers for Sidney J. Clark to comply with a subpoena duces tecum, issued by the Attorney General pursuant to 29 Del.C. § 2502, seeking to obtain certain books and records which are in the custody of court-appointed receivers to take charge of and settle the business and affairs of Clark. Clark was subsequently disbarred and now stands under indictment for embezzlement.
In response to an order to show cause why the receivers should not be directed to comply with the subpoena, Clark appeared and contested. He…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Blue Hen Country Network, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- United States v. BuckDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1973
- Kreider v. F. Schumacher & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- In re Attorney General's Investigative Demand to MalemedSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
- Papadopoulos v. WBCMT 2006-C29 NC Office, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018