Legal Opinion

In re Attorney General's Investigative Demand to Malemed

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 24, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’HARA, Judge.

On June 20, 1984, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Delaware (“Attorney General”) issued an investigative demand, pursuant to 6 Del.C. § 2514, to Michael Malemed individually and doing business as Space Tech Industries (“petitioners”).1 The matter comes before the Court at this time on petitioners’ motion, pursuant to 6 Del.C. § 2517, for a protective order limiting the scope of the investigative demand (“demand”).

The stated purpose of the demand is to determine whether petitioners have committed violations of 6 Del. C. § 25132 by engaging in:

[misrepresentation…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. W. W. Tuttle, Resident Manager, Ernst & ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. American Pot. & Ch. Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1964
  5. United States v. W. F. Reno, A/K/A Bill RenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
  2. KDM Development Corp v. The Consumer Protection Unit of the Department of Justice of the State of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
  3. State v. Cabela's Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API