Legal Opinion

Koepnick v. Arizona State Land Department

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 26, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 07-0271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal arises out of an order entered by the Arizona Land Board of Appeals affirming a decision by the Commissioner of the Arizona State Land Department reclassifying state trust land leased by appellant Max Koepnick from agricultural to commercial. The superior court affirmed on review of the Board’s decision.. On appeal, Koepnick argues the reclassification was improper as a matter of law and made by the Commissioner in violation of his constitutional, statutory and contractual duties. As we explain below, we disagree and affirm the superior court's decision.

FAC…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Gladden Farms, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Petras v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State v. Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Baier v. Mayer Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Saldate v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API