Legal Opinion

Department of Labor & Industry Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 2009No. 2211 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

The Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (Bureau) appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision granting the Application for Supersedeas Fund Reimbursement (Application) filed by Crawford & Company (Insurer). On appeal, the Bureau argues that the Board erred in granting Insurer reimbursement from the Workmen’s Compensation Supersedeas Fund (Supersedeas Fund) because Insurer requested reimbursement for treatment rendered prior to the date on which it requested supersedeas reimbursement.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Robb, Leonard & Mulvihill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Stonebraker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Mark v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Westmoreland Casualty Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Department of Labor & Industry Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API