Legal Opinion

Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 2009No. 1396 C.D. 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Henkels & McCoy (Employer) and its workers’ compensation Insurer Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Insurer) (together, Petitioners), petition for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision to limit reimbursement from the Superse-deas Fund (Fund) to Petitioners under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1041.4, 2501-2708. They contend that the WCJ erred as a matter of law in denying reimbursement for the payment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robb, Leonard & Mulvihill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Mark v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. J.P. Lamb Construction, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API