Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
Henkels & McCoy (Employer) and its workers’ compensation Insurer Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Insurer) (together, Petitioners), petition for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision to limit reimbursement from the Superse-deas Fund (Fund) to Petitioners under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1041.4, 2501-2708. They contend that the WCJ erred as a matter of law in denying reimbursement for the payment of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robb, Leonard & Mulvihill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Mark v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- J.P. Lamb Construction, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.