In re Graham
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Applications for writs of Habeas Corpus, The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.
The petitioners were charged on an information, in substance, of wilfully and feloniously making an assault upon one Eobert McDonald, and putting him in bodily fear and danger of life, and feloniously robbing him of $200 in money,— such-petitioners being each armed with a dangerous weapon, namely, a loaded revolver, him, the said Eobert McDonald, did wound and strike and rob, etc. The petitioners were convicted of the offense as charged, and Graham ivas sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for the period of thirteen years, and McDonald, for the period of fourteen jmars. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- In re Crandall for a Habeas CorpusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Petition of SemlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- State ex rel. Welch v. SloanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Fitzgerald v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- In Re TalleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.