Legal Opinion

Haber v. Monroe County Vocational-Technical School

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1982No. 2721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERTZ, Judge:

This appeal is from an Order granting the motion of Appellee, Warren Balderston Company, to be dropped as a party pursuant to Rule 2232(b), Pa.R.Civ.P. Appellants contend that the lower court improperly granted the motion in that it considered facts which were not of record.1 We agree with this contention and therefore reverse.

Appellant, Nicholas J. Haber,2 (hereinafter minor Appellant) was injured while assisting in the operation of a tilting arbor saw owned by Monroe County Vocational Technical School (School). At the time, minor Appellant was a CETA employee working at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Satchell v. Insurance Placement FacilitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Clouser v. Shamokin Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Chaplin v. PeltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Petro v. Kennedy Township Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HYK Construction Co. v. Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Haber v. MONROE CTY. VO.-TECH. SCH.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. LaSalle Bank v. Whitman, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Manayunk Neighborhood Council Inc. v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API