Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Locke

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1957No. 6245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The appellant, Mary Locke as executrix of the last will and'testament of W. C. Locke, deceased, complains of a judgment rendered against her by the district court of Roosevelt County in an action begun against her testator during his lifetime in which she was substituted as a defendant following his death.

The plaintiff, R. H. Chapman, by his complaint filed in the case sought recovery against W. C. Locke and Frank Locke, his son, on an oral agreement to drill an irrigation well on the land of the former. Within a short time following the filing of the complaint and service on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kandelin v. Lee Moor Contracting Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hendricks v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Marchbanks v. McCulloughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Home Savings Bank of Des Moines v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Adams v. LeybaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Gladin v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API