Legal Opinion
Rosebrock v. BEITER
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 26, 2011No. CV 10-01878 SJO (SSx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 32]; DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 37]
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Donna Beiter and Ronald Mathis (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Robert Rosebrock’s (“Plaintiff’) separate Motions for Summary Judgment, filed on October 18, 2010 and October 25, 2010, respectively. (Docket Nos. 32, 37.)' Plaintiff submitted an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion on November 1, 2010. 1 Defendants submitted…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald MathisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Walsh v. EngeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Watters v. OtterDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2014
- Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald MathisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014